<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<TEI xmlns='http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0'>
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title type='main'>VESA_1919_10_19_Olzendam_2</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>tranScriptorium</publisher>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl><publisher>TRP document creator: chris.burns@uvm.edu</publisher></bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text>
		<body>
			<pb n='1'/>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>Mr. W. H. Dyer</l>
					<l>Salisbury</l>
					<l>Vermont</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>Oct.19,1919</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>My dear Mr. Dyer:</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>Your letter of the fourth was duly received</l>
					<l>and I would have answered it before this had I not expected</l>
					<l>to call upon you when I was in Middlebury recently-the</l>
					<l>scarcity of trains was the reason that I did not do so.</l>
					<l>There seems to be some misunderstanding in the minds of</l>
					<l>some of the legislators, just as you express in your letter—</l>
					<l>from what you say I am forced to think that you consider the</l>
					<l>Constitution of Vermont supercedes that of the United States</l>
					<l>of America. If such is the case, may I ask you how you</l>
					<l>explain the fact that Prohibition which was enacted recently</l>
					<l>in the United States by an amendment to the Federal Constitution,</l>
					<l>is already operative in Vermont? The Federal Suffrage</l>
					<l>Amendment will operate exactly in the same way in every state</l>
					<l>in the Union as soon as it is ratified by 36 states. The</l>
					<l>enclosed copy of the Federal Suffrage Amendment may help in</l>
					<l>clarifying the situation.</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>As I tried to explain in my previous letter to you which</l>
					<l>was sent also to all our friends in the legislature(which</l>
					<l>includes a large majority in both houses), we are getting</l>
					<l>these signatures in order that when Senator Howland and his</l>
					<l>legislative committee call upon the Governor, there may present</l>
					<l>to him the names of a majority in both houses who petition</l>
					<l>him to call a special session to ratify the suffrage amendment.</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>This has ceased to be merely a state affair, but as the en¬</l>
					<l>closed list of ratifications show you, Vermont has the opportu¬</l>
					<l>nity of being among the 36 necessary states-in fact she has</l>
					<l>the chance of taking that important position —the 36th State.</l>
					<l>If we do not have a special session, Vermont may be the means</l>
					<l>of denying the privilege of voting for next President to 18</l>
					<l>states—that is, the women of those states. Perhaps you do</l>
					<l>not realize that 15,000,000 women will vote for next President</l>
					<l>whether ratification is complete or not. We are anxious</l>
					<l>to remove the injustice done to the rest of the women, which can</l>
					<l>be done only by ratification of the Amendment.</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
			<p>
				<lg>
					<l>You can readily see by the text of the amendment that as soon</l>
					<l>as it is ratified women will have the same voting privileges as</l>
					<l>men in every state in the Union. Hoping to receive your signa¬</l>
					<l>ture to add to the majority already secured of the best men in the</l>
					<l>legislature, I am, Very truly yours,</l>
				</lg>
			</p>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
